Sometimes, you need to hear something several times before you finally realize how practical and applicable what you are being told actually is. This recently happened to me regarding Progress OpenEdge Table Partitioning. Perhaps, it will happen to you too if I share my recent “aha" moment with you.
Several weeks ago Rich Banville, Progress Fellow for database technology, and I were on a call with a customer, and Rich made a suggestion on how the customer should partition their 4TB table to minimize disruption to their production system. That’s when the lightbulb went off in my head. I had previously heard Rich discuss the approach several times, but it was only at that very moment, in a real world scenario, that I completely understood how valuable and practical the approach was.
The customer, like many of our other customers, has a large multi-terabyte database that cannot be offline for more than 3-4 hours. I suggested that they use Progress OpenEdge Pro2 in combination with OpenEdge Table Partitioning, as I described in my previous blog, Simplify Your Database Needs, to partition their database. While it would have been effective, this solution was not practical for them due to additional hardware they would require to migrate the data to OpenEdge Pro2.
At one point during the conversation the customer said, “Our history table is 4TB in size,” and we can’t afford the load on the system or the downtime in order to split into partitions. Rich responded by asking our customer if this history table could be partitioned by date. Once that was confirmed, Rich proceeded with a possible way forward:
For over 20 years, I have been working on database products and database technology. In the last six years I have had many discussions about Table Partitioning—several of them with Rich. In fact, I believe he had very eloquently explained this exact migration scenario to me on several occasions. However it wasn’t until that very moment when we were speaking with a customer regarding a real-life scenario and a reasonable set of limitations for migrating to partitioned tables, that I completely understood it. I also realized how awesome it was that Progress thought through this migration scenario with this set of limitations in the design phase of OpenEdge Table Partitioning.
I find this to be the case with many Progress OpenEdge features. All of the angles are thoughtfully considered to ensure the best possible experience for the customer, and when a practical customer scenario arises for a given design consideration, we get to have that "AHA" moment understanding why something was done just as it was.
Read more about OpenEdge Table Partitioning or contact us to learn more about how Progress can help you meet the demand for continuous operations. OpenEdge Table Partitioning is also a component of the Advanced Enterprise Edition helping organizations to cost-effectively manage their biggest data challenges.
Tom Kincaid is the VP of software development for OpenEdge, Corticon and Modulus at Progress Software. Prior to coming to Progress he was the VP of development at EnterpriseDB. He is one of the founding architects and managers of the Java 2 Enterprise Edition (J2EE) platform and was the Executive Director of Application Platforms at Sun Microsystems. Tom was also the Director of Quality Engineering at Red Hat Inc. He has spent his entire career in the Boston area and has almost 30 years of experience developing and delivering high quality software products for developers.
Copyright © 2018 Progress Software Corporation and/or its subsidiaries or affiliates.
All Rights Reserved.
Progress, Telerik, and certain product names used herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of Progress Software Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates in the U.S. and/or other countries. See Trademarks for appropriate markings.