Automate your infrastructure to build, deploy, manage, and secure applications in modern cloud, hybrid, and on-premises environments.
The development and launch of Sitefinity 11.0 has been an exciting process. With the latest release, you may have noticed some changes with the structure of the documentation. The framework, codenamed “Feather,” has been moved and is now substituted with MVC. The new default doc structure is oriented toward the MVC approach compared to the previous version, which was WebForms. Long story short, WebForms and “Feather” switched places in the documentation and now MVC is the default and WebForms is in a separate category.
Additionally, the MVC widgets in the hybrid pages are on top of the toolbox from version 11.0. This is a small but important step in the adoption of Sitefinity MVC. With all that said, our recommendation to all Sitefinity developers is to use MVC whenever possible, especially for new projects.
Recently we ran a survey with our Sitefinity developer community and found that MVC is the preferred way of coding in Sitefinity on 100% of new projects. In addition to that data, we had discussions with our partners and they confirmed MVC is their preferred way to develop with Sitefinity. Now, finding MVC documentation is easier—no more looking for codenames like “Feather.” With that minor change in the documentation, we wanted to make things easier for people already using MVC and promote the preferred way of developing with Sitefinity.
If we compare Sitefinity MVC vs. WebForms, there are many advantages in favor of MVC. I don’t want to bore you with all the nitty-gritty details, so here are a few high-level advantages worth mentioning:
Developers could modify the default implementation to fit their scenarios in minutes. Taking advantage of all those things will make your developers much more productive and cut the time to market dramatically.
The simple answer is to start using MVC—it’s never too late to switch sides! But sometimes it’s not so simple. I see three major challenges that might make switching difficult:
The first step to solve #1 and #3 from this list is to ask yourself whether using MVC will greatly benefit your development and productivity. The answer is “yes, it will” and you shouldn’t wait! The Progress Sitefinity team recommends our customers use MVC instead of WebForms. Now that we’ve convinced you, the next step is to go through the documentation and learn more about it. Here are two great articles to start: MVC capabilities and APIs and Providers.
When it comes to #2, the reality is that it’s really hard to migrate projects from one technology to another. It takes time and money. We perfectly understand this and won’t insist on unreasonable things. Our recommendation here would be to migrate to MVC when sites are still small to midsize because once the project becomes huge, you won’t be able to.
At this point, I’m sure many of you may have this question in your heads. The answer? No, nope and absolutely not. Our intention is to provide the best solution for Sitefinity developers and give them the right recommendations.
Let me know what you think! I am more than happy to discuss why MVC is superior and why you should use it.
Peter Filipov (Pepi) is a Product Manager focused on expanding Sitefinity ecosystem. His prior experience as a Developer Advocate and Manager of Engineering helps him to understand the customers’ and market needs of Sitefinity. He also is passionate about being active and healthy 24/7 😊.
Subscribe to get all the news, info and tutorials you need to build better business apps and sites
You have the right to request deletion of your Personal Information at any time.
You can also ask us not to pass your Personal Information to third parties here: Do Not Sell My Info
Copyright © 2020 Progress Software Corporation and/or its subsidiaries or affiliates.All Rights Reserved.
Progress, Telerik, Ipswitch, and certain product names used herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of Progress Software Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates in the U.S. and/or other countries. See Trademarks for appropriate markings.