Create and deliver personalized experiences across digital properties at scale
Build engaging websites with intuitive web content management
Leverage a complete UI toolbox for web, mobile and desktop development
Build, protect and deploy apps across any platform and mobile device
Build mobile apps for iOS, Android and Windows Phone
Rapidly develop, manage and deploy business apps, delivered as SaaS in the cloud
Automate UI, load and performance testing for web, desktop and mobile
Host, deploy and scale Node.js, Java and .NET Core apps on premise or in the cloud
Optimize data integration with high-performance connectivity
Automate decision processes with a no-code business rules engine
Globally scale websites with innovative content management and infrastructure approaches
Content-focused web and mobile solution for empowering marketers
Faster, tailored mobile experiences for any device and data source
UX and app modernization to powerfully navigate today's digital landscape
Fuel agility with ever-ready applications, built in the cloud
I continue to be surprised by the number of enterprise architects I talk to that think that the way to implement design-time governance is to have a checkpoint, before a service goes into production, to validate the service meets the requirements and rules.
The key problem with this approach is that it's already too late. By the time a service is ready to be deployed, it's well past "design-time" (technically, it's actually "deployment time"). So, one of two things happen: The service meets the requirements so it can go ahead, or it doesn't. If it doesn't, it's back to the drawing board for a redesign (or the project gets deployed anyways because it's more important than following the rules set by the enterprise architect).
While it's definitely valuable to have deployment-time validation "checkpoint," you shouldn't confuse this with design-time. Real design-time SOA governance happens when the service is being designed (surprise!), so that you avoid problems before they are baked in and expensive to change.
If your design-time governance approach consists only of checkpoints at deployment-time, you should really call it what it is: "redesign-time governance".
View all posts from dan foody on the Progress blog. Connect with us about all things application development and deployment, data integration and digital business.
Copyright © 2016, Progress Software Corporation and/or its subsidiaries or affiliates.
All Rights Reserved.
Progress, Telerik, and certain product names used herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of Progress Software Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates in the U.S. and/or other countries. See Trademarks or appropriate markings.