Build, protect and deploy apps across any platform and mobile device
Leverage a complete UI toolbox for web, mobile and desktop development
Automate UI, load and performance testing for web, desktop and mobile
Rapidly develop, manage and deploy business apps, delivered as SaaS in the cloud
Build mobile apps for iOS, Android and Windows Phone
Optimize data integration with high-performance connectivity
Connect to any cloud or on-premise data source using a standard interface
Build engaging multi-channel web and digital experiences with intuitive web content management
Automate decision processes with a no-code business rules engine
According to the FT, the Financial Industry Regulatory Association
is undertaking a “sweep” of broker-dealers that offer direct market access to
high-frequency traders to find out if they have pre-trade risk management
controls in place for their algorithmic customers. (Read the full story here: http://tinyurl.com/28rg287).
Here at Progress Software we have been advocating the use of pre-trade risk
management tools for some time. The prospect of High Frequency Trading (HFT)
firms running trades directly through broker algorithms (naked access) to
exchanges/ECNs without adequate supervision has always concerned us. Brokerage
firms simply give their clients an exchange ID number, which the clients then
enter into their algorithms so that they can trade directly with the exchange.
Regulators are right to be concerned. Unfiltered access to trading
destinations can end up causing trading errors or worse. Anything can happen
with naked access; from fat fingered errors, trading limits being breached,
even fraud - all of which can cost brokers, traders and regulators big money.
Although the SEC proposed banning naked access in January, and the
Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) is likely to follow in its
footsteps, there has been considerable pushback from brokers and trading firms.
They say that adding a pre-trade risk management step would cause a
"latency hop" in the trading process, claiming it would make them
uncompetitive. A layer of risk management often adds a third party into
the mix, and - consequently - a delay.
But if everyone is required to add real-time, pre-trade risk
management, then the competitive disadvantage is moot. The benefits of being
able to pro-actively monitor trades before they hit an exchange or ECN far
outweigh any microscopic latency hops in any event. The naked access playing
field is hardly level. There are trading systems out there that claim to
throughput a trade in 16 microseconds from outside an exchange's firewall,
while exchange and ECN systems range anywhere from 250 to 700 microseconds
(according to measurements by latency management firm Corvil).
Latency is clearly an important issue and complex event processing
offers a solution. Brokers can achieve ultra-low-latency pre-trade risk
management without compromising speed of access. An option is a low
latency "risk firewall" utilizing complex event processing as its
core, which can be benchmarked in the low microseconds. With a real-time
risk solution in place, a message can enter through an order management system,
be run through the risk hurdles and checks, and leave for the exchange a few
It is the ideal solution to a tricky question - how do I manage risk
before my trade hits the exchange without compromising speed? The benefits are
clear - a latency hop of a few microseconds not only saves money, it can also
prepare your firm for the regulatory future.
View all posts from The Progress Guys on the Progress blog. Connect with us about all things application development and deployment, data integration and digital business.
Copyright © 2017, Progress Software Corporation and/or its subsidiaries or affiliates.
All Rights Reserved.
Progress, Telerik, and certain product names used herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of Progress Software Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates in the U.S. and/or other countries. See Trademarks or appropriate markings.