Create and deliver personalized experiences across digital properties at scale
Build engaging websites with intuitive web content management
Leverage a complete UI toolbox for web, mobile and desktop development
Build, protect and deploy apps across any platform and mobile device
Build mobile apps for iOS, Android and Windows Phone
Rapidly develop, manage and deploy business apps, delivered as SaaS in the cloud
Automate UI, load and performance testing for web, desktop and mobile
Host, deploy and scale Node.js, Java and .NET Core apps on premise or in the cloud
Optimize data integration with high-performance connectivity
Automate decision processes with a no-code business rules engine
Globally scale websites with innovative content management and infrastructure approaches
Content-focused web and mobile solution for empowering marketers
Faster, tailored mobile experiences for any device and data source
UX and app modernization to powerfully navigate today's digital landscape
Fuel agility with ever-ready applications, built in the cloud
Mike Champion of Microsoft picked up on comments from both my and Roger Voss' blogs on what the impact of LINQ means to the evolution of the Java language.
I'd like to first clarify my motivations for sticking my neck out on this: I recently had the opportunity to sit down with Rick Ross, and Matt Schmidt of JavaLobby (and now DeveloperZone) and I debated whether I am a former/current or indeed active Java protagonist. I think given the 8 years I spent working for Java/Sun, it is hard not to take the Java perspective any software debate. My time these days is focused on driving .NET technologies for DataDirect, so my first hand experience with emerging .NET innovations will always prompt me to wonder what this means for the Java community. So in effect, I don't believe my views are entirely representative of the Java community, but more one voice of the Java community who now is fully engaged and an active participant in evolving .NET.
So now that you know where I am coming from, I'd like to take a deeper look at some of the advances, at least from the JDBC perspective which I kicked off when we filed the JDBC 4.0 specification a few years back. At that time, we had a strong push for ease-of-development. Graham and I had strong motivations to leverage the newly introduced annotations and generics language functionality. Introducing, for example @sql tags, a number of new classes quickly allowed us to improve day-to day life of a JDBC developer. For the goals we originally set ourselves, I think the result is nice, and reasonably clean.
3 years however, is a long time in software - now that we have LINQ the game is clearly afoot, and the original goals we set fo JDBC 4.0 seem limited at best. I suspect many will react citing it is not fair to compare the two, as clearly LINQ is vastly more ambitious. However, in many respects JDBC is and will remain the lynch pin of Java data access (although XQJ will see increasing interest) , it does not seem unreasonable to me to look first at JDBC for a response to LINQ's disruptive influence...
In the meantime, I am already enjoying what LINQ can do - more on that in future postings.
View all posts from Jonathan Bruce on the Progress blog. Connect with us about all things application development and deployment, data integration and digital business.
Copyright © 2016, Progress Software Corporation and/or its subsidiaries or affiliates.
All Rights Reserved.
Progress, Telerik, and certain product names used herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of Progress Software Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates in the U.S. and/or other countries. See Trademarks or appropriate markings.