Deliver Awesome UI with the most complete toolboxes for .NET, Web and Mobile development
Automate UI, load and performance testing for web, desktop and mobile
Rapidly develop, manage and deploy business apps, delivered as SaaS in the cloud
Build, protect and deploy apps across any platform and mobile device
Automate decision processes with a no-code business rules engine
A complete cloud platform for an app or your entire digital business
Deploy automated machine learning to accurately predict machine failures with technology optimized for Industrial IoT.
Optimize data integration with high-performance connectivity
Connect to any cloud or on-premises data source using a standard interface
Build engaging multi-channel web and digital experiences with intuitive web content management
In this blog series about performance, we talk about what’s happening in the industry and discuss data connectivity trends and tips. Past topics include OData, Database Wars and Data Lakes.
In today’s blog, we’ll dive a bit deeper to the next level and start talking about architecture. It is all about how we design our software for performance, and it’s the same kind of approach you likely use when you design your applications.
When we talk about designing for performance, one of the first things that my engineers will do in the performance lab is to count the number of calls through the stack from the time the application gets to us until we exit our piece of software and actually send a request over the socket. In other words, our database drivers sit right on the socket, so they are the last thing that you go through before you communicate to the database or the data source.
The way we used to develop connectors here was to build a driver, which was typically based on ODBC or JDBC standards and sat on top of the client libraries. This driver would then do a translation before it got to the database itself.
As an architect, you would look at this and think: “Wow, that’s a lot of layers and a lot of dependencies. The code in those client libraries is not code that you own, so you would have to wonder, “What were the compiler options used when you generated that? How many layers thick is that before you get down to the wire? What’s going on behind the scenes?”
With fewer layers and no dependencies on third parties, you can start doing some really remarkable things at the code level.
Our architects soon determined there was a better way. We set about taking the idea of the client library and squishing it together with the top part. This resulted in just one layer underneath the application code that directly goes to the database or the data source, such as Salesforce or similar. So there are fewer layers to go through and you eliminate dependencies on third parties.
Since the database driver itself (or other piece of connectivity software) sits directly on top of your TCPIP sockets and your operating system, it is able to go directly to the source. This lets us do some really interesting things, like utilizing some C++ constructs that have come out in the last few years for concurrency models and shift workloads among different processors, taking advantage of your thread pulls. All of these techniques are what we use in the wire protocol drivers to be able to make sure that we’re delivering the most performance possible.
The drivers my team and I build here at Progress® DataDirect® are designed to be the fastest in the industry, and we stand behind that claim with award-winning technical support. When you find performance degradation issues in our software, we treat them like defects because we understand how important speed is to your business. You can pick up a free trial today and try it out for yourself, or watch a replay of my webinar, “Industry Insight: Optimizing Your Data for Better Performance.” Don’t forget to check back for the next installment of this series!
Mike is a proven leader with over 20 years of experience in developing commercial software for the industry leader in standards-based data access software. He has extensive experience in all aspects of commercial software development including requirements analysis, developing functional requirements, developing and mentoring individuals, staffing, budgeting, product development, quality assurance, training and customer communication. Mike has progressed in his career in large part from his strong work ethic and a “do whatever it takes” attitude.
Copyright © 2017 Progress Software Corporation and/or its subsidiaries or affiliates.
All Rights Reserved.
Progress, Telerik, and certain product names used herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of Progress Software Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates in the U.S. and/or other countries. See Trademarks for appropriate markings.