Create and deliver personalized experiences across digital properties at scale
Build engaging websites with intuitive web content management
Leverage a complete UI toolbox for web, mobile and desktop development
Build, protect and deploy apps across any platform and mobile device
Build mobile apps for iOS, Android and Windows Phone
Rapidly develop, manage and deploy business apps, delivered as SaaS in the cloud
Automate UI, load and performance testing for web, desktop and mobile
Host, deploy and scale Node.js, Java and .NET Core apps on premise or in the cloud
Optimize data integration with high-performance connectivity
Automate decision processes with a no-code business rules engine
Globally scale websites with innovative content management and infrastructure approaches
Content-focused web and mobile solution for empowering marketers
Faster, tailored mobile experiences for any device and data source
UX and app modernization to powerfully navigate today's digital landscape
Fuel agility with ever-ready applications, built in the cloud
Or at least that's the only reason I can find for some obvious things that seem to be missing in XQuery 1.0, one of which is the availability of a format-number() function, which is a quite basic function for creating a string representation of a number.
Why do I need to use XQuery rather than XSLT? Because the XHTML/XSL-FO reports I need to create are aggregating data that is available in part as XML documents, and in part inside a relational database; and at least some XQuery implementations make that task very easy to achieve in a highly scalable way.
Of course in most XQuery implementations like DataDirect XQuery or Saxon you can create Java extension functions to implement a format-number() function; but I wanted to find a way to achieve at least some of the format-number() functionality without having to rely on a Java function; that's why I ended up writing the attached piece of XQuery.
I haven't spent much time cleaning it up, adding documentation or making it part of a nicely structured library module; if anyone is willing to do that (or to make it become part of FunctX), please feel free to. And also, if you have any comments or suggestions about how to improve it, feel free to post them here.
digg_skin = 'compact';
View all posts from Minollo on the Progress blog. Connect with us about all things application development and deployment, data integration and digital business.
Copyright © 2016, Progress Software Corporation and/or its subsidiaries or affiliates.
All Rights Reserved.
Progress, Telerik, and certain product names used herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of Progress Software Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates in the U.S. and/or other countries. See Trademarks or appropriate markings.