Create and deliver personalized experiences across digital properties at scale
Build engaging websites with intuitive web content management
Leverage a complete UI toolbox for web, mobile and desktop development
Build, protect and deploy apps across any platform and mobile device
Build mobile apps for iOS, Android and Windows Phone
Rapidly develop, manage and deploy business apps, delivered as SaaS in the cloud
Automate UI, load and performance testing for web, desktop and mobile
Host, deploy and scale Node.js, Java and .NET Core apps on premise or in the cloud
Optimize data integration with high-performance connectivity
Automate decision processes with a no-code business rules engine
Globally scale websites with innovative content management and infrastructure approaches
Content-focused web and mobile solution for empowering marketers
Faster, tailored mobile experiences for any device and data source
UX and app modernization to powerfully navigate today's digital landscape
Fuel agility with ever-ready applications, built in the cloud
Roger Voss, posting on JavaLobby gives what I believe a very pragmatic view of what LINQ means to not only Java, but to the broader developer community. His approach I think, is particularly appropriate: in the aftermath of what was an energetic JavaOne 2006, it's important to take a step back beyond the Ruby on Rails or EJB announcements and take a long hard look at the ubiquity a language advancement such as LINQ offers.
Microsoft is already on the their third CTP of the LINQ and associated technologies. Obviously there will be an adoption curve as people figure out what it means to their development efforts, but there is no room for the Java community to rest on their laurels. Both a discussion (current active on JavaLobby) on a equivalent development (or standardization) effort for the Java language, I hope will be brought to the fore. With a wide ranging, frank and well articulated discussion on this, ultimately will be to the benefit of both Java and .NET developers alike.
On one point, I do disagree with his assertion that "There will still just be XPath for XML, and nothing at all for in-memory object graphs. Tuples?". He should consider XQuery and what this means as significant bridge to providing the mechanics of LINQ for the Java platform. If the level of functionality offered in DataDirect XQuery, and the level of symmetry between the W3C XQuery language syntax and rules, you quickly see a strong correlation between the two. Check out Jonathan Robie's blog for more thoughts.
One way or the other, and I agree with Roger Voss on this : C# 3.0 and the next generation of the .NET Framework is poised to grab some major attention, or as Voss puts it "In the on-going saga of the Language Wars, Microsoft's new LINQ feature looks poised to kick butt and take names. For in the meantime, over in the Java community, EJB3 persistence and its portable query language syntax will be regarded as the height of Java technology for query."
View all posts from Jonathan Bruce on the Progress blog. Connect with us about all things application development and deployment, data integration and digital business.
Copyright © 2016, Progress Software Corporation and/or its subsidiaries or affiliates.
All Rights Reserved.
Progress, Telerik, and certain product names used herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of Progress Software Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates in the U.S. and/or other countries. See Trademarks or appropriate markings.