Create and deliver personalized experiences across digital properties at scale
Build engaging websites with intuitive web content management
Leverage a complete UI toolbox for web, mobile and desktop development
Build, protect and deploy apps across any platform and mobile device
Build mobile apps for iOS, Android and Windows Phone
Rapidly develop, manage and deploy business apps, delivered as SaaS in the cloud
Automate UI, load and performance testing for web, desktop and mobile
Host, deploy and scale Node.js, Java and .NET Core apps on premise or in the cloud
Optimize data integration with high-performance connectivity
Automate decision processes with a no-code business rules engine
Globally scale websites with innovative content management and infrastructure approaches
Content-focused web and mobile solution for empowering marketers
Faster, tailored mobile experiences for any device and data source
UX and app modernization to powerfully navigate today's digital landscape
Fuel agility with ever-ready applications, built in the cloud
In this two-part podcast Rob Steward discusses what to look for in a highly effective database driver. Part 1, which runs 3:49, focuses on ODBC, while Part 2 will concentrate on JDBC.
Click on the following link to listen to the podcast: http://dataaccesshandbook.com/media/Rob9.mp3
Well of course I’ve spent my career developing, producing database drivers of all sorts: ODBC, JDBC, LAB and ADO.NET. And I’ve spent my career looking at different implementation, and looking at the way these things are written and how they interact with the databases. And I can tell you unequivocally that they make a huge difference in terms of your overall performance, reliability, and scalability of your data access applications.
There are several things that you need to look at when you look at those drivers from a cursory glance – or from a quick look – at a driver, what separates one from the other? The first thing I’d say is the architecture of that driver. ODBC was the first real standards based API that came out for which companies built drivers. That driver, what it does eventually is translated from that common API into some underlying thing that talks to a database or a data source. Data drivers do more than just that translation, but I’ll concentrate on that.
What it translates to underneath, when ODBC was originally released – or if you look at say JDBC when it originally came out and there were really just the beginning of JDBC drivers as well – the way they were written was you had this driver piece that sat on top of some other client API from the database vendors themselves. So let’s say in the case of Oracle you may have an ODBC driver, which is this layer that does this translation – it handles the error mappings, and it handles characters and translations, and all kinds of other things that it does. But it sits on top of what’s called OCI from Oracle – the client interface that Oracle has – and then that actually talks across the network to the database server, to the Oracle server. Same thing is true with the DB2, or with SQL server, or Sybase or Oracle or any of the other ones we’re familiar with.
One big difference there are with drivers is whether that driver can talk directly to the database across the network, or whether it needs to sit on top of some other layer. What we call that in ODBC terms, we’ll call that a wire protocol driver. So if a driver doesn’t need any of those underlying client pieces from the database vendor, and it can directly open up the TCP/IP Docket or same pipe or something to the database, then we call that a wire protocol driver. It is a standalone piece that you can put with your application that can talk directly to the database. It doesn’t need some instillation of some other piece, which can cause you all kinds of versioning issues. Particularly we see it with Oracle where people say, ‘well I need a particular version of the ODBC driver, but I also need some particular version of this client piece, but I have another application that sits on the same machine that needs a different version of that client piece or a different version of the ODBC driver. And what you end up with is a big mess where it’s difficult in a Windows environment to use all of those things on the same machine.
View all posts from Rob Steward on the Progress blog. Connect with us about all things application development and deployment, data integration and digital business.
Copyright © 2016, Progress Software Corporation and/or its subsidiaries or affiliates.
All Rights Reserved.
Progress, Telerik, and certain product names used herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of Progress Software Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates in the U.S. and/or other countries. See Trademarks or appropriate markings.